Skip to main content

Why Trump had every right to stick it to Megyn Kelly



There were only two things worth watching on the boob tube last night: Jon Stewarts's final show as host of The Daily Show and, of course, the first GOP debate on Fox. Those who missed the latter will no doubt have heard by now the "potshot heard around the world", when Trump essentially gave debate host Megyn Kelly the verbal equivalent of the middle finger.

And she deserved it.

With media outlets speculating that Teflon Don has a serious issue with women because of his pointed response to the Sweetheart of Fox News, lost in their righteous indignation is the very basic fact that Kelly acted like a midget in a boxing match with a pituitary giant-- she punched below the belt.

Early in the debate, Kelly questioned Trump about his temperament, pointing out that Trump had called women "slobs," "disgusting animals" and "fat pigs". Trump, being the fair and nice guy that he actually is, replied that he only made those statements in reference to Rosie O'Donnell. I say Trump was being nice because if a debate moderator had framed a question to me in such a manner, I would've jumped off the stage and bludgeoned the sonofabitch with a sack of frozen oranges.

You see, Megyn Kelly could have posed the question in a more tasteful and decorous manner. Something like "You've made some insensitive comments toward women in the past, Mr. Trump. Do you think that's the kind of temperament the American people are looking for in a president?" would have sufficed.

But Megyn Kelly chose not to take the high road, instead framing a question to Trump in a manner that she never, in a million years, would ever pose to another more "serious" candidate. That, and that alone, is why Trump flipped his combed-over lid, ending his fiery retort by informing Megyn Kelly that he had been nice to her up until now, and warning her that if she continued to act like a mean-spirited ratings whore (which is what I would have said), then maybe he won't act so nice toward her in the future.

Nothing wrong with that.

In fact, I commend Trump for his restraint.

What Donald Trump has a problem with, and rightfully so, is the perception that he is not a serious candidate.  That's why he opened the debate by refusing to pledge that he would not run as a third party candidate. And why should he make that pledge and squander the power he has thus far accrued? Everyone knows it's lights out for the GOP if he runs as a third-party candidate, because he'll take votes away from Jeb, Ted, Marco, or whoever the Republican candidate is. Handing over that power would be a sign of colossal stupidity and, if you ask me, we've seen far too much colossal stupidity in Washington already.

I used to admire Megyn Kelly, but over the years I've grown revolted at the way she suckles the establishment teat. And make no mistake, Kelly's true mission wasn't to moderate a serious debate, but to weed Trump out of the GOP lineup, thus opening the door for a second-tier candidate like Carly Fiorina or Rick Perry to take his place. You know, a more "serious" candidate.

What it all boils down to is this: Trump embodies the best American quality there is- the refusal to sit down and shut up when we are told that we're out of our element and have no business being in certain company. Trump's up-yours-attitude is the very same attitude that guided Rosa Parks and Jackie Robinson. They, like Trump, were also told to go to the back of the bus. And yet they never threw anyone under the bus, unlike Megyn Kelly and Fox News.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Deal With Having an Ugly Baby

If you're the parent of an ugly baby, you've probably been asking yourself lots of questions ever since your bouncing bundle of shame came into this world. Questions like, "Is this some sort of punishment from God?", "Should I leave him in a dumpster?" or "How much can an ugly baby fetch on the black market?" These types of questions are perfectly normal. The only thing that's abnormal is being the parent of an ugly baby and acting like you have the cutest, sweetest, or prettiest baby in the world. That, my friend, is mental sickness.  When my oldest son was born, I was asking the same questions myself. I fell to my knees and raised my arms to the heavens, asking, "What have I done to deserve this?" In the delivery room, I pleaded with the doctor to put him back in because he didn't look quite done yet. When that didn't work, I waited until no one was looking and tried to swap him with a better-looking baby from the hos

In defense of high school football

Once again, high school football is under attack by lame-brained, limp-wristed, lily-livered pantywaists who believe that anyone who straps on a jock is taking the first irrevocable step toward an inevitable, premature departure from this mudball called Earth. The latest anti-jock rhetoric comes in the wake of the death of New Jersey high school senior quarterback Evan Murray, a tragedy that followed the deaths of two other high school athletes in recent weeks, Ben Hamm from Oklahoma, and Tyrell Cameron from Louisiana. With three kids gone to meet their maker in as many weeks, it's only natural that over-protective parents throw a hissy hit over the glorious American institution that is high school football. However, this anti-jock fervor is nothing more than contemporary culture's latest attempt to neuter the American male-- a project that has been going on for decades, as part of the left-wing agenda to transform red-blooded American boys into sniveling wimps who would

GOP candidates as classic Twilight Zone characters!

Anyone who has been following Republican politics this year will tell you that, at times, the race has looked more like The Twilight Zone than actual politics. Here's what the current crop of presidential hopefuls would look like if they were characters from Rod Serling's classic series.